My i7 7700k Has Arrived - Insights, Benchies & Overclocks Inside (Now With Delid!) 10
Please submit bug reports and feature requests to the AOSP tracker. They could increase it sure, but there's a reason they haven't already, it's not a simple oh we forgot to clock it higher, let's do it now. Just now, TheCherryKing said:.
Sign up to get your own personalized Reddit experience!
Sign in with Steam. Does this mean it will perform better than the Exynos because its running at a much higher clock speed? So in qualcomm didn't fix the problems, great One plus one mobile price in india and features You misunderstand what the JVM does. No reposts, spam or rehosted content.
Non-Build Benchmarks
You and Cykalogic are the one's pulling guesses out thin air. A durable and reliable machine that is relatively lightweight, has all the hardware it needs to never feel sluggish and has a great IPS matte screen. How fast is your internet connection?
Recommended Posts
It's got a 5 point oh. If the emulation layer programmers did their work correctly, you won't be interpreting requests every time. Whereas Geekbench scores can be manipulated easily, and deviate too much on consrquitive runs on clean installs. Memory subsystems take up a majority amount of spape on cpu's.
Software technology oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700 windows
10.02.2018 - Even just shared memory access would be incredibly problematic. Some cores at 3 ghz will totally be more power efficient than other cores at 2. For their iPad soc it's even more. So in qualcomm didn't fix the problems, great I feel like we are reaching longer lifespans finally. Unless if the A9 is also a tri core, then it will definitely be ahead in terms of multi core performance. Link to post Share on other sites.
Homens oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700 version
16.02.2018 - And actually while we're on this subject, the JVM is a monolithic cross-aechitecture codebase aka a NoArch executable, which you will observe if you install it on Linux. The hardware is already easily capable of 60 fps, Android just needs further optimisation. In both cases, however, this would presuppose that ASUS adhered to its usual scheme for the model numbers. What i found interesting about this chip is that i read they are improving the on-chip image processing, particularly to make low light pictures better. No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.
Atube oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700 sonando
22.02.2018 - That's whee your wrong. Well, once it is, we can see if Qualcomm's competing. Downsides are mostly due to its age, most notably the screen resolution of x and usb 2. All while using massive fuck tons of power. Tegra 2 was laggy, Tegra 3 was laggy, Shield Tablet is laggy and Nexus 9 too. You gotta be troll if you think Apples SoCs are shit because majority of this sub would agree that apples hardware is one of the best in the industry.
Kodi oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700
27.01.2018 - Even the "locked" version could be overclocked through the multiplier within quite reasonable limits. If we're ignoring the form factor, the i launched in and it beats the A8X in single-core and nearly doubles it in multicore. Log in or sign up in seconds. Submit a new post. Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. For rehosted content, post the original source instead. A gpu doesn't pick up where the cpu left off, it is assigned a task and reports back when it's finished.
Windows free download oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700
Are these incompatible apps will appear on the screens of Windows 10 on ARM users? They might get the wrong impression just because their device can run Photoshop means it can run games found on the Windows Store.
I could be wrong here but I think Microsoft is creating once again a hot mess they tried to erase when they ceased development of Windows RT by trying to be everything at once.
Which Windows version is the most hated in history? How fast is your internet connection? What is your first smartphone? What is your preferred personal email provider? Share your story here.
This is not surprising. It would be great if the real x86 processors could be made more energy efficient. Unfortunately, that is very difficult. That would be nice. I have a felling it will never be done.
Just look at how many times Cannonlake has been delayed. I'd rather see Microsoft taking a few pages of Apple's playbook by adding a 15W ULV core i5 for resource intensive tasks and a Snapdragon for lighter taks which will greatly improve battery life.
The question is can Microsoft do that kind of hand off of tasks between chips? Resource intensive tasks is the main reason why x86 tablets and laptops aren't going away anytime soon.
I think for the non techie people who would buy these ARM powered Windows 10 tablets and laptops, they might get the impression that they can run something like DaVinci Resolve off of it and expect it to run well which I think is just fantasy land.
It's hilarious to me that a reviewer would honestly use Geekbench as a performance metric. Only becasue it's probably the easiest to understand. DUH, if you emulate it it performs poorly Just a list of my personal scores for some products, in no particular order, with brief comments.
I just got the idea to do them so they aren't many for now. Don't take these as complete reviews or final truths - they are just my personal impressions on products I may or may not have used, summed up in a couple of sentences and a rough score.
All scores take into account the unit's price and time of release, heavily so, therefore don't expect absolute performance to be reflected here. A durable and reliable machine that is relatively lightweight, has all the hardware it needs to never feel sluggish and has a great IPS matte screen.
Downsides are mostly due to its age, most notably the screen resolution of x and usb 2. From my perspective, this product has no redeeming factors given its price and the competition.
It is underpowered, overpriced, impractical due to its single port and is made redundant even by Apple's own iPad pro line. A good phone for the price. It does everything I and most people need without being sluggish and has no particularly bad flaws.
The lack of recent software updates and relatively barebones feature kit most notably the lack of 5GHz wifi, biometric sensors and backlight for the capacitive buttons prevent it from being exceptional.
Overpriced and rushed, offers nothing notable compared to the competition, doesn't come with an adequate charger despite the premium price. Worse than the Macbook for not even offering the small plus sides of having macOS.
Buy a Razer Blade if you want high performance in a relatively light package. Quite possibly Intel's best product launch ever. It had all the bleeding edge features of the time, it came with a very significant performance improvement over its predecessor and it had a soldered heatspreader, allowing for efficient cooling and great overclocking.
Even the "locked" version could be overclocked through the multiplier within quite reasonable limits. A pretty good product, sunk by its price plus the extra cost of the physical keyboard and the pencil.
Buy it if you don't mind the Apple tax and are looking for a very light office machine with an excellent digitizer. Particularly good for rich students. Bad for cheap tinkerers like myself.
Emulation does not have to be slow. What do you think the Java JVM is exactly? It is the emulation of a theoretical machine. We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals. Cinebench is very consistent.
It's also incredibly ARM-biased in its optimisation. It still hasn't taken AVX into account, whereas SiSoft Sandra has, which is why Skylake-x has double the per-clock performance of Skylake in the multimedia benchmark.
You got to be kidding. AnTuTu is even worse than Geekbench. At least Geekbench gives you a somewhat comprehensive breakdown of what was tested. AnTuTu is easier to understand One of the main reasons why people use Geekbench is because it runs on so many platforms and it's strictly a CPU test.
You misunderstand what the JVM does. Your Java code is universal, but the JVM itself is compiled individually for each architecture. It's an interpreter with sandbox features to put it simply.
It is nothing like an emulator. Emulation, on the other hand, translates precompiled executables from one assembly language to another. Depending on what it's translating, performance may vary, but going from a cisc architecture, with HUNDREDS of valid commands, to a risc one is inevitably a demanding operation and will degrade performance.
It is particularly ridiculous to use it on a synthetic benchmark, which is in theory, because geekbench fails at it optimized to squeeze every last drop of performance out of a given chip and can't possibly work as intended if you have to translate its requests every time.
It's also worth noting that different emulations have different requirements, as is clearly demonstrated by the dozens of console emulators that sometimes underperform even on machines that are hundreds of times more powerful than the original hardware.
While in theory it may be possible, it would definitely require specific hardware support as opposed to off the shelf products. A gpu doesn't pick up where the cpu left off, it is assigned a task and reports back when it's finished.
Even just shared memory access would be incredibly problematic. Whereas Geekbench scores can be manipulated easily, and deviate too much on consrquitive runs on clean installs. Listen babe, I just wanted to let you know that you're one of my bros, just like my bros are my bros.
There is nothing "wrong" with being wrong. Learning from a mistake can be more valuable than not making one in the first place. Follow these simple rules in life, and I promise you, things magically get easier.
These are the results for Tegra 3. This is why people call bullshit when they see Geekbench: Quad core clusters laid out, 1 for lower voltage and clockspeed and another for higher voltage and clockspeed and the 2 A72's for great single thread performance is very good.
Not everyone has the time money or expertise to make a huge wide core and power gate the fuck out of it when not in use then build a extremely sophisticated brach predictor and a million other things.
It's a lot more expensive on transistors aswell Mediatek's approach for X20 is quite good considering all they have is off the shelf arm ports. Voltage scales power usage quadratically, that's a fact no matter what architecture you are using.
Higher voltages are required to hit higher clock speeds. They could increase it sure, but there's a reason they haven't already, it's not a simple oh we forgot to clock it higher, let's do it now.
At this point it absolutely does, they're not limited by anything else. Clock speeds are still pretty low. And just because Kryo cores are custom doesn't mean they escape the laws of physics.
It's impossible to create a core that has high clock speed and the same performance as another core with lower clock speed without power penalties. Dude everything you're saying is false and makes absolutely no sense.
You're simplifying some of the most complex and sophisticated machines ever built into dumb pipes where electricity goes in and performance comes out. So much more than power and clockspeed goes into a CPUs performance, including but not limited to hazard detection, branch prediction and caching, the efficiency and design of ALUs for complex math, and so, so, so much more.
Even then it'd be only a rough estimate. How do you just not understand that different CPUs made by different companies have completely different die sizes, number of transistors, number and design of logical components, etc, that all affect power consumption?
How is this not sinking in yet? We have no idea how this CPU is built, it's a custom fucking core. The Samsung Exynos and Snapdragon were both off the shelf ARM designs but this will be a totally different beast and because of that, no one has any idea what power consumption will look like at any GHZ.
One, Samsung can reach the single threading performance easily with its current design. To the first statement: The cores Samsung currently uses are rated at 2. You listed a bunch of stuff that is responsible for the real world performance of a CPU like branch prediction but doesn't affect how much the performance scales when you increase the core clock.
Playing with the current Exynos showed that it actually scales pretty well. Sorry but we are not talking about a A8x compared to a K1. Both the Exynos and the new QC will use the same manufacturing process.
I agree that we don't know how big the new QC chip will get and how good its power gating will be, therefor it could in theory be more efficient. If QC didn't archive a miracle Look, I am not arguing that your logic is wrong but when we talk about a new SOC we know very little about it makes sense to make educated guesses from the little information we got.
Who knows until it actually happens, but who cares? Samsung has their own custom core in development called Mongoose so this is pointless to even talk about. That only makes sense if you're talking about the same core design.
Some cores at 3 ghz will totally be more power efficient than other cores at 2. This is a brand new core design with what we can assume is an assload of QC custom secret sauce, so again, why the fuck are we talking about power consumption at a certain GHZ?
There's no information to base any speculation on. One of the biggest bottlenecks in any CPUs performance is waiting to load information from the cache and sitting around wasting cycles for that.
A cache miss can frequently happen when branch prediction is wrong and it's a giant performance hit, and clock speed has nothing to do with it. Look no offense but why are you trying to talk at a deep level about a topic you're not educated in?
That was an example, an analogy. My point that you completely missed is that custom core designs are wildly different, like the will be different from the, and the will be from Exynos.
First off, it's not just power gating, it's everything about the chip design, and second, thank you for realizing that you don't know anything about the new chip and that you were talking straight out of your ass when you said:.
That's the only thing I'm saying and I'm trying to very carefully explain why that's the case. You and Cykalogic are the one's pulling guesses out thin air. So according do your logic, say I have an Intel i which is clocked at 3.
Which would have higher single core perf? Also, Intel's broadwell lineup uses less power than say the Pentium series in the older days. But they still have higher clockspeed. At what point did I say that?
I stated that you can't create a core with a high clock speed and same performance as another core that has lower clock speed and the same performance without using more power. And performance does improve linearly to clock speed at the low frequencies mobile chips run at.
It's only when you get to 3. Sure, performance does improve linearly with respect to clock speed. But it's nowhere near to 1: Also even on the same fab node, what you said could be untrue.
Not sure about processors, but let's take a and a The is on the same fab node as the 28nm, but it consumes less power and gives out more performance.
I think it's all about architectural efficiency. Also it's not certain if it will still have 8 cores. We're still a long way off from predicting the power consumption. That said, The Exynos is an excellent chip and I'm looking forward to what the Note 5 will be like.
I find it hard to believe this is the, because of that leaked snapdragon benchmark, so I'm willing to bet that the author of the article mixed up the and The higher the score in a certain thermal envelope means less power used doing the normal everyday thing.
The thing is, ui is still not 60fps on android with the SD Pull down the notification tray while in browser with a heavy website and it becomes evident. Of course that's more of a software problem though.
At this point those sorts of issues are likely to be only fixed by software. The hardware is already easily capable of 60 fps, Android just needs further optimisation.
Assuming these benchmarks accurately depict a phone with this SoC early next year unlikely IMO, the numbers are disappointing not because it's slow but because it's slower than its competition which will be almost a year old by that point.
What i found interesting about this chip is that i read they are improving the on-chip image processing, particularly to make low light pictures better. If that comes to pass that will be way more important than the raw speed of it.
If it can truly improve image processing that would be a huge selling point because basically no one is happy with how phones do in low light image processing. Does this mean it will perform better than the Exynos because its running at a much higher clock speed?
Anyways hopefully it doesn't overheat I guess. If it performs better, it'll be the very high single threaded performance. Multicore is only 2. Unless this is a weird 3 core processor, its probably pretty early hardware with one of the cores disabled, broken cache coherency, or some other limitation.
Don't look only at the overall scores. Looking deeper into the benchmark will reveal that the cores scale nearly perfectly, except in the RAM tests bringing down the overall multicore score.
Things like cache coherence take a pretty big hit on cpu performance unless the threads they are running are mutually exclusive. Cores don't scale very linearly.
This is why in typical non server work loads we haven't gone past quad core designs all too often. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Log in or sign up in seconds. Submit a new post. Submit a new text post. Android subscribe unsubscribe 1,, readers 3, users here now Chat on our Discord server! Chat on our IRC channel! Chat on our Telegram group!
Hover for more info 1. Only submissions that are directly related to Android are allowed. We welcome discussion-promoting posts that benefit the community, and not the individual.
Please submit bug reports and feature requests to the AOSP tracker. Images must be in self posts. Developer self promotion must meet these guidelines. Self promotion is meant for community members only: A few sentences and a link won't cut it.
No reposts, spam or rehosted content. Duplicate posts on the same topic will be removed, even if it's a different source. For rehosted content, post the original source instead.
This can usually be found at the bottom of the article. In most cases, you should use the same title as the article you're posting. Download unverified APKs at your own risk.
No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.
Free download oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700 new gmail
Nov 26, · arguable that a quad-core Intel Core i7, even a fanless one, core and 7, on multi-core tests on Geekbench. abysmal Geekbench scores is an. Nov 15, · tonymacxcom: Home of the it now includes both CPU and OpenCL Benchmark. Please post your Scores Here. Intel Core i (non-K) Graphics.
27.01.2018 - It is the emulation of a theoretical machine. But they still have higher clockspeed. How it gets to those values is irrelevant hence many JVMs, but same behavior. Ccleaner free download per windows 7 - Online ccle... Samsung has their own custom core in development called Mongoose so this is pointless to even talk about. They're the ones leading the charge to catch up to Intel in the nanometer department.
Tons cinza oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700.
22.02.2018 - At what point did I say that? These are the results for Tegra 3. Ccleaner free download 2011 for windows 7 - 902 22... Share your story here. It does everything I and most people need without being sluggish and has no particularly bad flaws.
Hope victory oneplus 5t geek bench 4 scores i7 7700 running headshots.
28.03.2018 - For rehosted content, post the original source instead. Things like cache coherence take a pretty big hit on cpu performance unless the threads they are running are mutually exclusive. I'm more inclined to think what we're seeing is what we're getting. Ccleaner free download for windows 7 home premium... Posted November 25, Or sign in with one of these services Sign in with Facebook. Who knows until it actually happens, but who cares?
OnePlus 5T Flagship Smartphone With SD HOMTOM HT17 PRO Design, AnTuTu, Hardware, Battery, Camera The chipset scores an admirable score. AMD Ryzen 5 U Mobile APU GeekBench Scores Leak. the closest competitor on the Intel side would be the Intel Core iU which scores 4, in OnePlus 5T. Qualcomm's Snapdragon CPU Shows up In GeekBench; See How it Performs Don't look only at the overall scores. My OnePlus @ ghz gets ~/~
It is, after, arguable that a quad-core Intel Core i7, even a fanless one, could outperform an octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon under certain condition. An Android device running on a Snapdragon averages 2, on single-core and 7, on multi-core tests on Geekbench.
And, granted, these are most likely development boards with very early versions of Windows 10 on ARM. There are, however, still no signs of progress, nearly one year after the initial announcement.
The model number also reveals a few details. So she suggests that it is a 2-in-1 device from the ZenBook Flip series, as it has "traditional" model numbers with the letter sequence "TP" at the beginning.
The numbers in the model number provide information: The "7" in turn suggests that it could probably be more of a premium segment device. In both cases, however, this would presuppose that ASUS adhered to its usual scheme for the model numbers.
The benchmark results of the new ASUS notebook with Qualcomm CPU are about the same level as in the previously seen prototypes of Qualcomm and HP - about one third of the results reported by current smartphones with Android and the same processor.
Apparently, one is currently still in development, since the different measurement results each have widely varying version numbers of the firmware. I know how people in the forum tend to be dismissive of synthetic benchmarks including Geekbench but remember for the most part, devices scoring high in Geekbench are the ones that actually perform very well.
Are these incompatible apps will appear on the screens of Windows 10 on ARM users? They might get the wrong impression just because their device can run Photoshop means it can run games found on the Windows Store.
I could be wrong here but I think Microsoft is creating once again a hot mess they tried to erase when they ceased development of Windows RT by trying to be everything at once.
Which Windows version is the most hated in history? How fast is your internet connection? What is your first smartphone? What is your preferred personal email provider?
Share your story here. This is not surprising. It would be great if the real x86 processors could be made more energy efficient. Unfortunately, that is very difficult.
That would be nice. I have a felling it will never be done. Just look at how many times Cannonlake has been delayed. I'd rather see Microsoft taking a few pages of Apple's playbook by adding a 15W ULV core i5 for resource intensive tasks and a Snapdragon for lighter taks which will greatly improve battery life.
The question is can Microsoft do that kind of hand off of tasks between chips? Resource intensive tasks is the main reason why x86 tablets and laptops aren't going away anytime soon.
I think for the non techie people who would buy these ARM powered Windows 10 tablets and laptops, they might get the impression that they can run something like DaVinci Resolve off of it and expect it to run well which I think is just fantasy land.
It's hilarious to me that a reviewer would honestly use Geekbench as a performance metric. Only becasue it's probably the easiest to understand. DUH, if you emulate it it performs poorly Just a list of my personal scores for some products, in no particular order, with brief comments.
I just got the idea to do them so they aren't many for now. Don't take these as complete reviews or final truths - they are just my personal impressions on products I may or may not have used, summed up in a couple of sentences and a rough score.
All scores take into account the unit's price and time of release, heavily so, therefore don't expect absolute performance to be reflected here. A durable and reliable machine that is relatively lightweight, has all the hardware it needs to never feel sluggish and has a great IPS matte screen.
Downsides are mostly due to its age, most notably the screen resolution of x and usb 2. From my perspective, this product has no redeeming factors given its price and the competition.
It is underpowered, overpriced, impractical due to its single port and is made redundant even by Apple's own iPad pro line. A good phone for the price. It does everything I and most people need without being sluggish and has no particularly bad flaws.
The lack of recent software updates and relatively barebones feature kit most notably the lack of 5GHz wifi, biometric sensors and backlight for the capacitive buttons prevent it from being exceptional.
Overpriced and rushed, offers nothing notable compared to the competition, doesn't come with an adequate charger despite the premium price. Worse than the Macbook for not even offering the small plus sides of having macOS.
Buy a Razer Blade if you want high performance in a relatively light package. Quite possibly Intel's best product launch ever. It had all the bleeding edge features of the time, it came with a very significant performance improvement over its predecessor and it had a soldered heatspreader, allowing for efficient cooling and great overclocking.
Even the "locked" version could be overclocked through the multiplier within quite reasonable limits. A pretty good product, sunk by its price plus the extra cost of the physical keyboard and the pencil.
Buy it if you don't mind the Apple tax and are looking for a very light office machine with an excellent digitizer. Particularly good for rich students. Bad for cheap tinkerers like myself.
Emulation does not have to be slow. What do you think the Java JVM is exactly? It is the emulation of a theoretical machine. We do not sell cosmetics. We just blind animals.
Cinebench is very consistent. It's also incredibly ARM-biased in its optimisation. It still hasn't taken AVX into account, whereas SiSoft Sandra has, which is why Skylake-x has double the per-clock performance of Skylake in the multimedia benchmark.
You got to be kidding. AnTuTu is even worse than Geekbench. At least Geekbench gives you a somewhat comprehensive breakdown of what was tested. AnTuTu is easier to understand One of the main reasons why people use Geekbench is because it runs on so many platforms and it's strictly a CPU test.
You misunderstand what the JVM does. Your Java code is universal, but the JVM itself is compiled individually for each architecture. It's an interpreter with sandbox features to put it simply.
It is nothing like an emulator. Emulation, on the other hand, translates precompiled executables from one assembly language to another. Depending on what it's translating, performance may vary, but going from a cisc architecture, with HUNDREDS of valid commands, to a risc one is inevitably a demanding operation and will degrade performance.
That's really poor for an early SoC. The Apple A8X outperforms it in single core and almost matches it in multi-core. The will be in phones. If we're ignoring the form factor, the i launched in and it beats the A8X in single-core and nearly doubles it in multicore.
I was on a E until last yearish. Certainly better now on an i5 but that pc lasted forever. I feel like we are reaching longer lifespans finally. The CPU, however, is still snoozing doing absolutely nothing while I write this or even browse Reddit.
Well, once it is, we can see if Qualcomm's competing. Until then, we're looking at two products that don't exist. You gotta look at the transistor count and die size. Apple uses twice as many transistors jn their mobile socs than Qualcomm and Samsung do.
For their iPad soc it's even more. You say that like that's not worth. Memory subsystems take up a majority amount of spape on cpu's. Ok but the A9 will definitely be more powerful than the A8X and it will be in this year's iPhone.
Unless if the A9 is also a tri core, then it will definitely be ahead in terms of multi core performance. We don't know that for sure. The A8 in the iPhone 6 is only points above the A7 in the 5s in single core performance, and the A8x is points above the A8.
That's a small number to make a fus over. Ax chips throtlee significantly less than any soc in Android phones. So that high clockspeed might work for a Dev device with a metal plate in the SOC to dissipate heat but not in actual real world performance.
Apple has had always has a higher single core score tegra k1 is the only one that could challenge it in the same generation. Comparing it to the best of the best isn't really fair since it's been the tradition haha.
Test SoCs have much lower clock speeds for some tests. The release product will probably be much better. Speculation like that reminds me the whole M9 design leak supposedly being 'a fake case over the real design'.
I'm more inclined to think what we're seeing is what we're getting. Guess some people don't have the technical know-how to understand how ridiculous that is. You gotta be troll if you think Apples SoCs are shit because majority of this sub would agree that apples hardware is one of the best in the industry.
Look how the Exynos compares to the iPhone 6. Like I said, it nearly blows the iPad Air 2 out of the water, which is a top of the line tablet. You just don't have the technical know-how to understand how amazing that is.
Phones have a much smaller thermal envelopes and have to be much more battery-conscious. So comparing a tablet chip made in to a chip that's not even released yet is fair? That's still extremely biased.
What are you talking about? The Exynos is the chip in the Galaxy S So a chip vs an end of chip. Is it that hard to admit Samsung is capable of some amazing feats of engineering?
They're the ones leading the charge to catch up to Intel in the nanometer department. Nice, I won't be upgrading to another phone until phones with A72 cores hit the market though. Probably not, unless Qualcomm decides to change their usual roadmap after the bad reception of the I personally doubt it, there was a rumour that suggested October we could start seeing devices but I wouldn't bet on it.
If there is I'd say at the end of this year. Noooo they are just talking!! Tegra 2 was laggy, Tegra 3 was laggy, Shield Tablet is laggy and Nexus 9 too. The Nexus 9 is actually pretty damn smooth now.
The question comes now whether it will receive quick updates or not. Even the current Silvermont Atoms aren't that bad and can keep up with the last generation flagships and with the SD flagships this year.
I wish I knew more about Atoms. The ZenPhone 2 really got me noticing Intel in the mobile market. Intel's been taking it step by step for the last few years with Atom SoCs. I think the new 14nm may finally make Intel a strong contender especially for mid and high end.
There's a rumor that a Samsung tablet will be using the 14nm Atom x5. I only care about how it does with power consumption. We're at a point where the chips are plenty powerful for smooth use in almost every phone, I just want better power usage.
Not even matching multi core performance while single core performance can be boosted easily by Samsung Samsung can boost single core clock speed ala Intel's turbo boost. Every chip in the mobile world has that exceotninsteadnof letting heat and power usage govern boost like Intel amd and Nvidia, mobile socs just use thermal throttling.
Don't know why you get downvoted, while all your doing is speculating it seems fairly logically that a 3GHZ chip with the same process is using more voltage than the current Exynos.
No word yet on whether it's octa or quadcore. I'm hoping for the latter. That way it saves silicon space, which means lower costs and lower temperatures or higher peak speeds, like the rumored 3GHz.
Wait, are you saying the may be a quad core soc? Is that even possible now that they've gone octa? Honestly I kinda like the apple method myself. My note 4 absolutely slaughters most every task with relative ease and games look amazing and it's on a quad ore soc.
I was reading up on the Helio soc and it's not even out yet and is using a lot of outdated tech.. Plus 8 of it's ten cores are weaklings when compared to their direct competition.
That's whee your wrong. A53's are the most efficient core out there in the mobile world save possibly Cyclone and A7. Quad core clusters laid out, 1 for lower voltage and clockspeed and another for higher voltage and clockspeed and the 2 A72's for great single thread performance is very good.
Not everyone has the time money or expertise to make a huge wide core and power gate the fuck out of it when not in use then build a extremely sophisticated brach predictor and a million other things.
It's a lot more expensive on transistors aswell Mediatek's approach for X20 is quite good considering all they have is off the shelf arm ports. Voltage scales power usage quadratically, that's a fact no matter what architecture you are using.
Higher voltages are required to hit higher clock speeds. They could increase it sure, but there's a reason they haven't already, it's not a simple oh we forgot to clock it higher, let's do it now.
At this point it absolutely does, they're not limited by anything else. Clock speeds are still pretty low. And just because Kryo cores are custom doesn't mean they escape the laws of physics.
It's impossible to create a core that has high clock speed and the same performance as another core with lower clock speed without power penalties. Dude everything you're saying is false and makes absolutely no sense.
You're simplifying some of the most complex and sophisticated machines ever built into dumb pipes where electricity goes in and performance comes out. So much more than power and clockspeed goes into a CPUs performance, including but not limited to hazard detection, branch prediction and caching, the efficiency and design of ALUs for complex math, and so, so, so much more.
Even then it'd be only a rough estimate. How do you just not understand that different CPUs made by different companies have completely different die sizes, number of transistors, number and design of logical components, etc, that all affect power consumption?
How is this not sinking in yet? We have no idea how this CPU is built, it's a custom fucking core. The Samsung Exynos and Snapdragon were both off the shelf ARM designs but this will be a totally different beast and because of that, no one has any idea what power consumption will look like at any GHZ.
One, Samsung can reach the single threading performance easily with its current design. To the first statement: The cores Samsung currently uses are rated at 2. You listed a bunch of stuff that is responsible for the real world performance of a CPU like branch prediction but doesn't affect how much the performance scales when you increase the core clock.
Playing with the current Exynos showed that it actually scales pretty well. Sorry but we are not talking about a A8x compared to a K1. Both the Exynos and the new QC will use the same manufacturing process.
I agree that we don't know how big the new QC chip will get and how good its power gating will be, therefor it could in theory be more efficient. If QC didn't archive a miracle Look, I am not arguing that your logic is wrong but when we talk about a new SOC we know very little about it makes sense to make educated guesses from the little information we got.
Who knows until it actually happens, but who cares? Samsung has their own custom core in development called Mongoose so this is pointless to even talk about.
Coments:
14.02.2018 Tabei :
Jan 02, · Geekbench: https: //oneplusonemobilepriceinindiafeatures. blogspot. comnch at 5Ghz v for over 7 hours before one logical core (plus I witnessed a discrepancy of. OnePlus 5T billed for late and News > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 10 > Multiple Ryzen 7 U Geekbench results show it trading blows with the iU. Nov 05, · I just did a Geekbench test and I wasn't expecting these results OnePlus One; Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > 4. Geekbench score O_O Sep
07.03.2018 Guk :
Hi, I have Dell inspiron i7, and I want to know how powerful my Laptop still is! So I downloaded Geekbench 4 and did the test and following number came. OnePlus 5T Scores Impressively in Latest Benchmarking Leak as you will be able to see once you take a glace at the latest scores of Geekbench. OnePlus 5T i7. Nov 22, · OP3T Benchmarks Nov 21, Now this device can beat iphone 7 and 7 plus It scores over in single core and over in multi core in Geekbench 4.