OnePlus OnePlus X vs. Apple iPhone 6 Specs 10
In exchange, though, you get more of an iPad-like user experience on a much smaller device. Arrows and many of the popular punctuation marks are on the right, while options like copy and paste, undo and voice dictation are on the left.
Battery Benchmarks
Your claim is absolutely false. I've done real world testing. One plus one mobile price in india and features I can still wrap my fingers around the 6 just as easily as I could with the 5s and its curved sides don't cut as sharply as the edges on the 5sbut the large-screened 6 Plus is This is why apps like Tasker exist, or apps like Quick Titles which allow user to create custom shortcuts in their control panel exist, or apps like All in One Gesture which enable different gestures on any android phone and so on.
Physical Design
Apple even claimed that it's very rare for a phone to be throttled. Simple things like bringing up the phone app or bringing up the camera, etc.
OTHER COMPARISONS
What's more, in many of even these basic tests, the iPhone was faster or they were nearly identical in speed. One doesn't have much choice in phone chipsets anyway in the US. In my country there is saying: The iPhone family 9 Photos 9.
Nuances plus sombres oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus 3ds safe
10.03.2018 - Apart from the handy screenshot tool and other useful utilities baked into the Oxygen OS, the UI itself is light with snappy animations and carries a long list of customisation options that allow you to assign gestures to the fingerprint sensor, add and remove items from the notification shade, customise onscreen navigation buttons and assign shortcuts to the same, and more. As you can see below, the iPhone does better in some areas and worse in others. No they are not. Download a file and transfer it to a PC.
Pro oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus free version
21.02.2018 - That's a preference, not a capability. All prices in the above table are in Indian Rupees. Or get good games frames per second or export video quickly or do AR and VR rendering or Now-a-days Apple supporters basically have Geekbench on their phone so when they have a debate, they can show the scores that mean nothing in real-life use.
Windows free oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus
27.03.2018 - I don't speak for most users. Okay, then point me to an Anandtech review of another SD based phone where you feel the results are significantly different. I love this mentality. Just through the mobile site.
For windows oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus
22.02.2018 - The discussion was about an acknowledgement that thermal throttling is common across the line. That's the definition of a troll. I was literally just saying that they don't mean everything. Like the APK thing, I mentioned XDA and opens source apk's which makes you comment regarding security useless but surprise surprise you ignored that.
Sat sun oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus kilos dias
Not only do you get more rows of icons on each screen the 5s is 6 x 4, while the 6 is 7 x 4 and the 6 Plus is 7 x 4 with slightly larger icons and more space in between, but you're also going to be able to see more emails, tweets, Google search results, Engadget posts, calendar appointments and, well More screen space equates to more room for consuming, creating and manipulating content, and since it's still small enough to fit in most jeans pockets provided they're not too tight, it's still more portable than any iPad.
While the megapixel war rages on among manufacturers like Sony, Samsung, LG and Microsoft Devices Nokia, Apple doesn't seem to feel compelled to join the fray. Instead, it's sticking with a modest 8MP iSight camera similar to the one found n the 5s.
Fortunately, Focus Pixels doesn't disappoint; in several side-by-side shots in which my goal was to snap a photo as quickly as possible, the 6 and 6 Plus did considerably better at producing focused images.
This feature is designed to reduce the amount of blur that can come from the natural shaking of your hand, and it produces better low-light performance as a result.
I took several nighttime shots with the 6 and 6 Plus side by side, and although there was no difference in how much light the cameras took in, the images from the Plus consistently came out sharper -- both when viewing at standard size and especially when zoomed in.
I also pitted the Plus head to head against several other flagships. It bested the HTC One M8 in sharpness and white balance, though it didn't get quite as much light; it had more natural colors and less noise than the LG G3; it got more light, better colors and clearer focus than the Galaxy S5; and although the Lumia brought in the most light, it also did so at the expense of unnatural colors and noise.
So the iPhone 6 Plus held its own against nearly every major flagship in terms of low-light images, but how did it and its 4. Shots taken by the Lumia were far more detailed and had a slightly more accurate white balance and color representation outside; but while it did a fantastic job capturing the shadows, the highlights were typically more blown out than they were on the iPhone.
The GS5 is a respectable contender in the daylight as well, offering more detail, but the iPhone generally produced more accurate colors. The G3 appears to be overexposed by default and the dynamic range is not as wide, so shadows are incredibly dark and whites are slightly blown out.
The iPhone camera may not always be the best in every circumstance, but it's consistently near the top in almost every scenario. The autofocus locks quickly; each shot contains all of the detail you'll need unless you have to zoom in incredibly far ; dynamic range is great; and color representation is sound.
And although there weren't a lot of drastic improvements to the new iPhone cameras over the 5s, I know that if I need to snap a quick picture, it's going to turn out well. Full-res images are now available: I also have uploaded albums with samples from other flagship devices.
Last year, Apple rocked the boat by announcing that the iPhone 5s would be the first phone with bit support, thanks to its A7 chip. This year's bump to an A8 chipset isn't quite as dramatic, but the company is claiming that the chip comes with a 25 percent uptick in CPU performance and 50 percent in GPU output.
It packs 2 billion transistors, which is a number that few other companies boast in product launches; by comparison, Intel's Haswell desktop processor has around 1. Apple seldom dives into more specifics, but benchmarks reveal that we're looking at a 1.
I get why Apple would rather discuss the experience than the actual numbers -- it's because a 1. But I've never had any problems getting iPhones to handle heavy loads, and the 6 and 6 Plus are no different.
Games load and run smoothly and multitasking works great. When it comes to benchmarking, it can be difficult to compare Apples to Androids. There are a few cross-platform tests, however, so I decided to take a look and see how the iPhone 6 holds up to a pair of Snapdragon powered flagships, the Galaxy S5 and the HTC One M8.
As you can see below, the iPhone does better in some areas and worse in others. On SunSpider, it produced the best scores I've seen on any smartphone. It does well on single-threaded activities in Geekbench and keeps up with the Snapdragon in multi-threaded tests.
It does significantly better in Basemark X, but not in 3DMark. The long and short of it is that you shouldn't feel like switching from one flagship phone to another simply because it has more cores; Apple holds its own against the strongest competition, and it still has the advantage of having bit support on both hardware and firmware for at least a short period of time -- at least, until Android L comes out and more chipsets integrate bit support.
The iPhone 6 series also comes with an upgraded motion coprocessor called the M8, which adds barometer support in addition to the accelerometer, gyroscope and compass.
Since barometers can sense the variance in air pressure, this means you can now measure changes in elevation. Those measurements, in turn, will get added to the new iOS Health app.
Another interesting side effect of the size difference is how they manage thermal heat dissipation. Since it's the smaller of the two, the iPhone 6 got noticeably toastier than the Plus when playing games -- in fact, I rarely had any problem with the Plus getting warm.
If you're having trouble choosing between the 6 and its extra-large twin, battery life may be the ultimate deciding factor. It's no secret that the Plus comes with a larger battery and therefore longer runtime than the 6, but how much of a difference will it make?
Turns out, a noticeable one. In our video-playback tests, the 6 lasted 10 hours and 19 minutes; that's actually worse than the 5s results from last year, which managed to go for The iPhone 6 Plus, on the other hand, still had 14 percent battery left when the 6 died.
All told, it lasted almost 12 hours. Both of these results are lower than Apple's claims, but likely are the outcomes of different testing methods. But tests are tests: Real-world performance is where it's at.
And this is where the Plus truly shines. In my usage tests, I do a little bit of everything on the phone: After all that, I got through a full hour workday with just 3 or 4 percent battery life remaining.
On the 6, I managed to squeak out around 13 hours. With moderate to light usage, you should expect to see the Plus get roughly a day and a half, if not more. Both iPhones come in two versions with different sets of wireless frequencies, so you'll want to be aware of the differences.
The first option comes with support for 16 LTE bands, while the second takes the same 16 and adds four more bands for a total of This is the most I've ever seen included in one specific model.
I usually list out which bands are covered on which devices, but let's face it: If the band option doesn't include your specific needs, very few other phones likely will. The latter will ensure the most coverage globally, and will be sold in more places; in the US, however, you'll only find this version on Sprint and US Cellular.
The new iPhones also support WiFi calling with WiFi calling, which offers high-quality phone calls over your wireless router, is a carrier-dependent feature.
Most customers don't get speeds this fast from their ISPs, but at least the speed limit is no longer low enough to have a negative impact on your internet experience. Samsung's Galaxy S5 is 5.
It may physically look the same as the telephoto-lens equipped dual-camera setup of the OnePlus 5T, but OnePlus has made some significant revisions. However, this camera setup is geared more towards improving low-light photography and portrait mode.
At megapixels, the secondary sensor has 4 extra megapixels of resolution compared to the megapixel primary sensor. It is further optimised for low-light photography, with the extra resolution along with some software wizardry allowing it to shoot better in the dark.
Compared to its predecessor, low-light images come out sharper and bearing significantly greater amount of detail. Under good lighting, the photographs carry a surprisingly good amount of detail and fairly accurate colour reproduction as well.
Initially, I had put this down to the brilliant AMOLED display, but when I viewed the photographs on my colour calibrated monitor, I was pleasantly surprised by the overall camera quality.
The EIS works similarly well with videos, although I noticed some video compression related artefacting on p60 videos shot with complicated subject matter such as dense foliage.
Everything else is a piece of cake, with the videos exhibiting a decent amount of detail. The portrait mode works great thanks to a new algorithm and a dual-camera setup optimised for this very purpose.
The slow motion and time lapse modes work just as advertised, with the panorama mode proving itself to be quite adept at stitching and equalising gamma and white balance despite shooting under complicated lighting conditions.
The camera UI is fast and intuitive, with the Pro Mode actually allowing you to fine-tune advanced parameters that lead to significantly better shots, especially when the auto-mode fails to get it right.
Having used both versions for quite some time, I can safely say that at no point of time did the 6GB version leave me wanting for memory, no matter how many apps I had running.
The only reason to go for the top end version, then, would be for the generous internal storage and not because it comes with extra 2GB of RAM. The octa-core Snapdragon chip is paired with the powerful Adreno GPU, which can run pretty much any app or game you throw at it with consummate ease.
And the proof is in the pudding, or the synthetic benchmarks in this case. The synthetic benchmarks, along with the AnTuTu score of 1,80, pegs it around the same performance ballpark of the erstwhile OnePlus 5 and its other flagship competition for that matter.
However, what sets the OnePlus 5T apart is the painstaking optimisation that makes it feel like the fastest phone there is this side of the Google Pixel 2.
The story repeats itself in the real-world tests, with everything from resource heavy apps such as Prisma to demanding games such as Modern Combat 5 and Asphalt 8: The custom skin appears near stock and has zero bloat, while retaining some of the more useful features associated with custom Android skins.
This is akin to having your cake and eating it too, because you are essentially blessed with the performance and refinement of stock Android, while being pampered with all the features that make your phone productive right out of the box.
However, even the Android 7. Apart from the handy screenshot tool and other useful utilities baked into the Oxygen OS, the UI itself is light with snappy animations and carries a long list of customisation options that allow you to assign gestures to the fingerprint sensor, add and remove items from the notification shade, customise onscreen navigation buttons and assign shortcuts to the same, and more.
Apart from the split-screen mode that makes great use of the ultra-wide aspect ratio, OnePlus has added a nifty new feature dubbed Parallel Apps. This lets you clone apps such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, Twitter, LinkedIn, and more — basically apps where some people can benefit from having access to multiple accounts spanning work and personal, to even enabling easy access to sockpuppets for perennial trolls.
My only gripe with Oxygen OS is the piss poor management of photographs in the gallery app. I make it a point to recreate several months of usage on all my review units, and for that purpose I tend to dump a couple thousand photos onto the phone.
The OnePlus 5T makes this process excruciatingly painful with its pitiful photo segregation. That means I have no choice but to visually sift between a sea of memes saved from Facebook in order to find the photos that were snapped through the camera.
We already know that the OnePlus 5T has top-of-the-line hardware and the software too has been optimised to perfection. Combine the miniaturised 10nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon SoC with the cleverly optimised Oxygen OS, and you get a phone that delivers notably better battery life than its other Snapdragon equipped competitors.
Mind you, all of my OnePlus 5T usage has been with all the radios switched on all the time, moderate gaming, heavy media consumption, virtually constant usage of messaging apps, and quite a bit of the power-hungry Facebook and Instagram as well.
It works by offloading all battery management circuitry to the power brick, which does result in a rather gigantic wall adapter, but the dividends for this inconvenience are pretty magnificent. The Dash Charge mode can juice up the near-flat battery to 30 percent in fifteen minutes, with nearly 60 percent of charge being restored in 30 minutes.
Thereafter, the charging is slow, with the battery requiring around 90 minutes to reach percent. The OnePlus 5T is beyond doubt, the fastest charging phone in the market right now, and the Dash Charge feature makes emergency top-ups so convenient that it will be hard to run your phone flat even if you have the leave the house in a hurry.
The latter has some interesting AI integration that could potentially turn out to have significant impact, or not, but only time will tell. In other words, buy the OnePlus 5T unless you want a better camera.
The discontinued phone has the exact same hardware specifications as the OnePlus 5T, with the OnePlus 5 lacking the new bezel-less design and the However, what makes a major difference is the camera.
The OnePlus 5T has a significantly better snapper that shoots sharper and detailed images and performs much better in low light conditions compared to its discontinued sibling.
But, for all intents and purposes, nothing truly comes close to the OnePlus 5T at its price range. We already know that the Snapdragon SoC poised to be included in the upcoming phone is slated to be a game-changer due to the hardware-based support for AI and machine learning.
I've seen yesterday the article on XDA. Nice improvements across the board, the UX gets one of the biggest improvements which is great. S was already excellent and S seems to only bring further improvements to performance and efficiency.
I was expecting at least in single GB Score. I don't think we will get there until SnapDragon Just open an iPhone X and reverse engineer the thing. But seriously it looks like Qualcomm is at least 2 years behind Apple when it comes to CPU design, and if Apple can keep improving their processors and not get lazy because of lack of competition then Qualcomm may never get a chance to catch up.
Long Lasting Battery is more important to me than a more powerful processor. At this point, almost all flagships are performing really well. Battery life is what we need to concentrate on. Will my text messages get slow with every galaxy phone I've owned?
Staying with iMessage for the time being. The Exynos might prove to be better based on earlier benchmarks from last year. Single core scores top the SD on what I assume is a test processor.
There's another benchmark which appears to have the cores under clocked based on its score. Sony also seems to be testing the SD as seen below from last year: For fun here's a Samsung S9 running the SD Exynos processors are always slightly faster, you can expect a bump up to about in geekbench.
Exynos is going to be a lot faster, since Samsung switched to a 6-wide decode compared to 3-wide on the GPU is going to be another story. Qualcomm is so much ahead of others that I doubt anyone including Apple is even going to compete with the 's GPU this year.
Those were the only ones I could find at the time of my comment. I'm aware the cores are underclocked and fully expect better performance. The results you posted are in line with what I'd expect from Samsung running at or near it's true clock speeds.
I've used their Exynos via my Chinese Note 8. The performance was excellent and much smoother than my SD based Note 8. There's another one in Geek Bench here https: In the end of the day it's all numbers when the OS is not optimized and especially with phones with no stock Android which are even less optimized and then when it comes to the "poor" compared to the iOS optimization apps Why you comparing a closed system called iOS with a open system called android?
Its like saying you got the fastest running shoe's but when you go uphill thats when you get walked by people with different type of shoe's: Open source doesn't mean it should not be optimized.
More people can work on it Should be even better than iOS! Well due to so many hardware difference in each phone it would take more then having lots of people while apple just got good people making software for a handful of devices.
Both are fine and glad we have competition tho. I love this mentality. New chip is out that probably includes more than just increased computing capabilities. Even though the performance increase will hardly be of any benefit to the platform we're reporting about because software optimization has been the source of what smartphone users consider performance for several years now.
The A11 is severely thermally constrained and is only able to achieve these scores when the devices are cold. Peak performance is not everything if it can't be sustained. That only applied to the smaller iPhone The quote above is literally from one of Anandtech's writers.
He said he will do a more detailed comparison most likely after the first S phones will be released. In typical Raven Ridge fashion, you're only telling part of the story. In the Anandtech review, the very next sentence goes on to say This has long been a tradition with all Android phones.
If this is just now happening with the iPhone, this would be the first generation that hit that problem even by Anandtech's own tests. As an example look what happens with the Samsung S8 SD during a battery drain test.
After a couple minutes, it can't even do half the performance of an iPhone 7 A10 chip. LoL Steve, you are desperate as a little girl. And the same guy at Anandtech later clarifies: Snapdragon showed splendid performance in Atutu for example and excellent thermal performance combined with impressive efficiency.
But hey the A11 will still have the Geekbench advantage which is very useful for any smartphone user. Anandtech added that the was also ahead of its rivals in terms of battery life. Yeah the S8 which is not the ultimate example for S general thermal performance.
The discussion was about an acknowledgement that thermal throttling is common across the line. I even linked to Anandtech article that demonstrated how severely the SD throttles.
Anandtech provided no data on the SD to either confirm or deny throttling. Apparently, you have reading comprehension issues. In this initial article, the SD was not subjected to the same type of battery drain tests other other actual phones were.
Given the actual workloads in Geekbench which makeup the subtests, yes, that is very useful for a smartphone users. Only an ignoramus would imply otherwise.
Seriously, you're a moron. This is what happens when you put a chip in a real phone that has real thermal limitations. Seriously, I can't believe you actually made such a stupid comment.
Cherry-picking one test for one phone doesn't mean the S universally behaves like that. Anyway I leave the quote form Techsopt below. Seems you've missed it. General SOC efficiency 2.
Graphical performance and efficiency 3. AI, machine learning performance and efficiency. Modem, connectivity performance speed and efficiency. Add the fact that most Android flagships will ship phone with 6GB RAM and up and the iphone 8, 8plus and X look like really bad buys for That is why Steve, even on Android Police you are stocking me.
Talk about insecurity, what a loser. I believe the term you are looking for is "stalking" and don't flatter yourself. I have many post on AP over the years and I'm an equal opportunity offender to people who make stupid comments.
Interesting conclusion given that Anandtech hasn't published an in depth review of the A Yes, your bias is clear, but that's about it. Nothing Cherry picked about it.
Samsung phones are by far the most common. This is the phone most SD users will get. It doesn't matter what you believe now, S phones will start to pop out very soon and to you despair they make you eat your words.
You say this as if I won't be happy to revisit this topic. All I've said so far is that you are making claims that are not supported by any published data. That's as true now as it will be tomorrow.
If the S9 doesn't have thermal problems like the S8 does, then great. I've only said that I see no reason for that to change. I didn't declare one way or the other.
You on the other hand have made very specific claims. If the S9 does throttle on 3D battery drain tests, then it is you that will have to eat your words. Okay, then in the absence of synthetic benchmarks based on actual common workloads, what processor intensive task that happens to be cross platform do you recommend?
You see, you can't dismiss something that is actually meant to compare performance That's not how it works. Do you want to compare something like converting video, etc? Do you think you'll like those results better?
Okay, then point me to an Anandtech review of another SD based phone where you feel the results are significantly different. Don't just call me out for cherry picking without providing a valid counter example.
The burden is now on you to provide this. You claim things like "3. Yet, it doesn't even have a dedicated Neural Engine, so no, ti's not better than the A11 for such things. That would be meaningful if iPhones were running Android with makes the poor choice of using garbage collection for memory management in a mobile device.
Try learning a bit more about memory management before commenting further. The bottom line is that the SD doesn't have a Neural Engine. It is most definitely not the best SoC.
Anandtech hasn't even done a review of the A11 or the latest round of iPhones. Let's see how the SD actually performs in a real phone. What you're seeing now is the best case scenario where thermal limitations are likely not applied.
It likely won't have that luxury in a real phone. From your comments, it's clear that you know nothing about memory management and you clearly don't understand the downsides of the garbage collection method.
Again the A11 matches the performance here but with a device becoming very hot quite fast while the QRD was merely luke-warm in our preview benchmarking session.
So merely luke-warm in comparison to very hot quite fast. So in the end the S is still the winner. What you're seeing now is the best case scenarioWrong. You must have some mental problems if you claim iOS has the same features and more compared to Android.
It's funny, you keep talking about Qualcomm chips as if they are immune to thermal limitations. The irony here is that historically, the Qualcomm chips have been horrible with regard to needing to be thermal throttled.
You're also comparing a write-up about a reference design that's not even in a phone to a system that is in a phone. Let's see the SD in a Samsung S9 and then we'll see which device gets throttled the most.
I suspect you're not going to like the results. Again, your claim has not been demonstrated as fact. You are making assumptions in this regard. You are the one going on about how much better the SD chip is.
Yet, when confronted with the fact that it doesn't even have a neural engine, all you can do is point to the Kirin? How does that help your argument regarding the SD being so great?
Clearly, the SD is not nearly as great as you seem to think and the fact that you have to move the goal posts and talk about another product in defense of the SD is evidence of that. Also, no, the DSP is not the same or even a replacement for an actual Neural engine.
Even the tablet version which is irrelevant anyway because we are talking about phones is without a doubt behind. You can't even name any features where Android is more advanced and you even know you're wrong by attempting to exclude tablets even though they are running the same version of iOS, etc.
So it took you almost a week to come with such a lame answer. I can't say I didn't see it coming taking in consideration your desperation to have the last word no matter what.
I don't feel like education you again and showing you again how you are wrong but to your despair I will exemplify how Android is the superior OS in terms of features, flexibility, complexity.
It's interesting that you continue to support your claim that iOS has the same features and more. But it's not like you are very smart Steve, you are too much of a desperate fanboy and you don't know to pick up your fights.
I will leave even the tablet version in the equation see you need it so it's doesn't look like a total slaughter. And the examples I give will only take in consideration Android phones and stock Android, not modified or custom version and non-rooted devices.
On Android you can very simply install apk's. For noobs like Steve apk's are Android apps that can be downloaded from outside the app store and installed on your devices.
There are many very talented app developers especially on XDA that make great quality apk's and a lot of them are also open source. The existence of APKs opens a world of opportunities.
For example you can have the Pixel 2 launched on any Android smartphone and it's not just the Pixel 2 launcher it's a better version of it with support for 3rd party icon packs.
Android has a File Management system and you can download very easily any type of file with you phone browser just like you can with a x86 OS like Windows.
For example I was at a friend to reinstalled Windows on her very old laptop. After the installation was complete I has to install the Lan driver I hope I don't have to explain what this means and because she couldn't find her Drivers CD the only option was to use my phone.
Something like this is not possible on any version of iOS. Apps on Android are more powerful and ca do more stuff. This is possible because of how Android works.
For example apps can access Android's Accessibility features and do things like: This is why apps like Tasker exist, or apps like Quick Titles which allow user to create custom shortcuts in their control panel exist, or apps like All in One Gesture which enable different gestures on any android phone and so on.
Also the way Android apps communicate and share data between each other is more seemingless than on iOS. I can customize how links are open in certain apps or in general etc. Android allows you to install custom themes like the infamous Black Theme that a lot of iphone fans want.
After Google release the first version of Oreo developers realised that it's possible to install any custom theme on Oreo without Root. Android allows users to use NFC and Bluetooth and it's full capabilities.
For example I can use Bluetooth to transfer files like pictures, documents, videos, apk's etc. This is especially usefully when I want to send something small to someone and all I have to do is ask that person to activate Bluetooth.
This works between any Android phone and even older Nokia phones running Symbian. Though, it is an amusing diversion from time to time. Technically, you can do the same on iOS if you're willing to manually install the developer's certificate on your phone.
In either case, side loading is not recommended for security reasons and it's also one of the biggest sources of malware on Android. As such, it's not surprising to see you brag about this. You seem to think of yourself as being rather technical, yet, you can't seem to distinguish the difference between a file system and a file browser application.
For that matter, you seem completely unaware of the many ways to download and transfer files, including the many cloud and wireless options. Perhaps you should read up a bit before further exposing your ignorance.
Apps on Android are more powerful and can do more stuff. Newsflash, iOS apps allow extensions and for example, you can use the built in mark up to draw and other such things over other apps.
Similar with automation, etc. Again, your comments are just beyond ignorant. That's a preference, not a capability. Great, Android lets you create a less secure and less consistent user experience.
That's your example of Android functionality? For that matter, iOS users actually do have the option of a dark mode in iOS For starters, that claim isn't even true anymore.
Further, your examples are lame. That's a poor man's version of Apple's Airdrop. I can do the same thing with other iPhones, but from across the room. I don't have to do the stupid phone bump to make it happen.
Oh, give me a break Take the Samsung Galaxy users for example. They were just getting access to the Oreo update now and it didn't exactly go seamlessly for them, now did it.
It's really rather ridiculous that you even bring this up as any sort of advantage for Android as this process is MUCH better on iOS overall. It's not even close. If nothing else, you've done a fine job of exposing your platform ignorance in this discussion.
And I thought even an imbecile can understand what I wrote. Looks like I was wrong. I didn't only list features I explain and exemplified their usefulness and how they work. Like the APK thing, I mentioned XDA and opens source apk's which makes you comment regarding security useless but surprise surprise you ignored that.
And it's not just way way easier to install APK's on Android the quality and diversity of these apk's is on a hole different level. That is why they are so popular. That's a poor man's version of Apple's AirdropAre you really that ignorant to think you can't easily set ringtones on iOS as well?
On Android phones it's easy to set custom ringtones not on iOS. But what don't you prove I'm ignorant? How do you set a ringtone on iOS? Also I was talking about customization in general, I mentioned the ringtone just to mess with you, I knew you will act like this.
Your post was the writings of an imbecile. I fully understand what you wrote Crying about that now isn't helping your position. It's hard to tell if you are really that naive or whether you are just outright stupid.
Open source is no magic protection from security concerns. In fact, open source projects are specifically targeted. Once again, you don't understand the difference between a file system and a file browser.
For that matter, your description was very specific to how you do something on Android rather than a specific capability. While things are done differently on iOS, the same types of things can be done.
Developers are free to use it how they will. As for sending files, I've already made that clear, AirDrop is far superior. I can do the same thing as you and I can do it from across the room.
Why are you even still arguing this point? You've made this ridiculous claim, yet you're not able to provide any support for this claim. What exactly do you feel is better about the Android update process?
Explain how this process is somehow better on Android. But why don't you prove I'm ignorant? Again, it's very clear from your comments that you've never used an iPhone. On the iPhone, all you do is edit someone's contact and choose the ringtone you want.
If that's your definition of difficult or confusing, then perhaps you are as dumb as I think you are. If you haven't noticed, I'm enjoying this. So you fully understand what I wrote? Than you understand that the things I've listed the way I've listed them prove my point and show that you were wrong when you stated that "iOS has the same feature Android has and more"?
Like I've said you will blindly attack these features and that is what you did, like a trained dog. The thing is I didn't list them to get your fanboy approval, I didn't list them so you could tell me you like them, It's obvious you are desperate apple fanboy that tries all the time to deny the reality.
Like the fact that you don't understand how file explore apps work on Android differently in comparison to iOS or the fact that you lie when you say you can do on ios the same thing I did on my friend's computer show how ignorant you are.
Even if if you somehow manage to download the driver on the iphone connecting it to the laptop would do nothing especially when the laptop was running W7 with no drivers installed.
That is what you call easy? And I hope you didn't believe I was talking about default ringtones because that would extremely dumb and it would make me fell sorry for you and your stupidity.
Also another Android feature I've forgot to mention and I use constantly. So another plus for Android. Perhaps you missed the part where I responded to each of your points and very easily shot them down.
Oh, I do understand the differences. You seem to be stuck on the fact that because you do things differently on different platforms, that equates to different overall higher level functionality or capabilities.
If you honestly think that I can't download a file and then transfer it to a PC, then you are the one who is rather ignorant here. Again, I ask you how you feel this is different on iOS.
The fact that you think this is any worse on iOS demonstrates your ignorance. Further, at least on iOS all phones capable of running the update have the ability to do so.
On Android, it's hit or miss Most users never get the chance to update and for those that do, the update comes months late and often with problems. If you meant something different from what I explained, then the fault is yours for not specifying.
Either way, you're still wrong. I can change the ringtone for everyone under the sounds and haptics settings. As for creating custom ringtones, there are multiple easy ways to do that including iTunes and on the phone through a number of free apps, etc.
It's a really nice feature Steve, but ignorants like you obviously try anything to deny the reality in the most dumb random way possible. You attempted to provide examples of how things were better on Android and I shot down each of your examples rather easily.
In the end, all you've done is demonstrate that you don't understand each platform enough to talk about them. All I had to do was shoot down your examples to demonstrate functionality parity.
I did that rather easily. The operative term there is "the same way". While the paradigm for managing data files is different on each OS, the same overall functionality exists. I can still transfer files and apps can still use those data files.
You also fail to acknowledge the various cloud based options that are not local if you want to manage them manually as well. Apple even has a built in Files app for their own Cloud service.
At the end of the day, you need to describe a higher level function that cannot be performed, not the steps or process it takes to perform them. You continue to conflate the "what" with the "how".
As I mentioned, there are a variety of ways of doing this right out of the box. Download a file and transfer it to a PC. Likewise, once again, you are wrong. You are the one that keeps imagining stuff.
Your link was broken, even with removing the space. Once again, all you can do is make unsupported claims. Why is it that after so many posts, you're still unable to articulate a single advantage of the Android install process??
What part of the "there are ringtone apps on iOS that do the same thing" do you not understand? For that matter, if you want to assign a ringtone to a specific contact, you still have to go through the steps of navigating to that contact.
For that matter, just because Zedge is the best option on Android doesn't mean it's the best option on iOS. Not having any security at all is also a nice "feature" in terms of convenience and flexibility.
However, the importance of security is obviously lost on ignorant people like you. There is no paradigm you simply can't manage local storage on iOS the same it's possible on Android phone.
I never mention cloud storage so thta's a pointless direction. My responses demonstrated that you don't understand the capabilities of the platforms you talk about. Perhaps you need to go back and read those responses.
I responded to each one individually. Where you mentioned something specific, I countered with something specific. Where you mentioned something generic, I countered with something generic.
That's how it goes. Again, if you understood the platforms you speak of, you'd know that files in iOS are managed by the applications they are associated with.
So, yes, the paradigm is different. Yes, I'm sure you consider that discussion pointless as it serves to nullify your entire argument. This is absolutely true and can't be countered by anything.
I responded to this as well. If you want to rehash this argument, fine. As mentioned, you can sideload apps on iOS as well if you're also willing to install the developer's certificate.
Of course, you also ignore the security implications and discussion which followed. Good, then you do agree the paradigm is different.
For oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus windows start
Primate Labs founder John Poole has plotted the kernel density of Geekbench 4 scores for iPhone 6s models running iOS, iOS, and iOS iPhone 6 and 6 Plus Top Most Benchmarks and Battery Tests, While 6 Not surprisingly with its mAH battery, the iPhone 6 Plus grabs Benchmark scores.
23.02.2018 - It also includes the statement below from Apple: Than you understand that the things I've listed the way I've listed them prove my point and show that you were wrong when you stated that "iOS has the same feature Android has and more"? On Android you can very simply install apk's. Ccleaner free download for xp latest version fileh... I have Oreo 8 running on a Nexus 7 tablet, which handily outperforms my iPad mini. Do you use Facebook on your phone?
Windows xsplit broadcaster oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus.
26.01.2018 - Nothing to see folks so everyone move along now. This is why Benchmarks should be taken with a grain of salt. At the end of the day, you need to describe a higher level function that cannot be performed, not the steps or process it takes to perform them. Ccleaner free download for windows 7 hippo - 9mm a... This is why Benchmarks should be taken with a grain of salt. Not many, as far as I know. If that's what you're referring to as "real world" tests, that doesn't cut it.
Latest version oneplus 5t geek bench battery score iphone 6 plus.
30.01.2018 - The benchmarks is how some people discovered their phone was throttled in the first place. You see, I can type in caps as well. If that's your definition of difficult or confusing, then perhaps you are as dumb as I think you are. Ccleaner free download for windows 8 2015 - Videos... Another interesting side effect of the size difference is how they manage thermal heat dissipation. Nevertheless, despite its solid build quality, you still have to be mindful of accidental drops considering the slipperiness of the chassis. Qualcomm does indeed suck.
OnePlus 5 vs Apple iPhone 6s Plus Mobile Phones Comparison Battery capacity (mAh) Compare Oneplus 5t vs. Google Pixel 2 vs. Oneplus 5. Product comparison between Apple iPhone 6 Plus vs Improved battery life With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Apple iPhone 6 Plus stands. Find Deals on Oneplus 5t Tpu in Phones & Acc. on Amazon.
After all, an aluminum phone needs to have openings for antennas to get a signal, and that's precisely what the stripes on the sides and back do. Unfortunately, though, they do detract from the device's beauty, not enhance it.
As for the camera, many flagship phones come with tiny humps around the camera module to compensate for the extra depth they require, but I would've rather seen Apple go with a design that's less severe.
A few folks have rightly pointed out that the lens is sapphire, so scratches shouldn't be an issue. Still, its prominence compared to the rest of the chassis remains a design distraction.
The phones are prone to scratches if you're not careful. After just a day of use, I started noticing a few small marks on the backs of both devices. The most extreme thing I did to the phones during this time was slide them around on an office table.
Granted, a case will resolve all of these issues, but unfortunately, cases also add a fair amount of bulk, and I've always preferred showing off my phones in all their beauty.
Apple's coming out with a mobile payment service in October called Apple Pay. I haven't been able to test it out yet, so I'll revisit that when it becomes available. In short, a transmitter on your device can communicate with a receiver located just a few millimeters away; this is incredibly useful for mobile payment transactions because the short distance makes it more secure than any other wireless connection, so you don't have to worry about a third party getting unauthorized access to your sensitive information.
Since NFC is a standard, the iPhone is theoretically capable of doing a lot more than just mobile payments -- tap-to-pair for Bluetooth devices, unlocking doors and hotel rooms, mobile tickets for public transit, Foursquare check-ins, et cetera.
For now, though, the iPhone's NFC radio will be limited just to Apple Pay; developers can't do anything with it right now. Apple hasn't said if this will change in the future, but I suspect the company is approaching it with the same timidity as it did with Touch ID; Apple initially used it just to unlock the iPhone and approve iTunes purchases, and now, a year later, it's finally opening up the sensor for developer support.
Both iPhones come preloaded with iOS 8. You can find my in-depth review of the update here, so I won't go into much detail in this review. But there are a few specific software features on the 6 and 6 Plus worth revisiting.
Apple is treating the Plus as a small iPad mini mini iPad mini? The springboard now can switch into landscape mode, and a few of the native apps Mail, Calendar and Messages come with dual-pane windows.
This is a great use of the extra screen space, and it gives the Plus a clear productivity advantage over the 6. While I'm on the subject of landscape mode, the keyboard also looks rather different.
The standard keyboard shows up directly in the middle and is flanked by heaps of symbols and other options. Arrows and many of the popular punctuation marks are on the right, while options like copy and paste, undo and voice dictation are on the left.
Both iPhones also feature Display Zoom, which magnifies the screen and makes your icons, text and other materials larger. There's one-handed mode, which Apple refers to as "Reachability.
Since it's tough to stretch your tiny fingers all the way to the top of the screen, Apple's solution is to bring the screen down to you. When you double-tap on the Touch ID button, the entire UI slides down so the top half of the app is located on the bottom half of the screen.
You can scroll and interact with it just like you normally could in full-screen mode, but in case you need to get to a link at the bottom of a website, or you're trying to get down to the end of an email, you'll have to go back out to see the entire screen.
It's better than having no one-handed mode at all, but it still feels cumbersome and I only really used it when I wasn't able to use two hands e. It may sound like the Plus isn't ideal, and indeed, it's not for everyone.
But for many, the additional screen real estate is worth sacrificing some one-handed comfort. Not only do you get more rows of icons on each screen the 5s is 6 x 4, while the 6 is 7 x 4 and the 6 Plus is 7 x 4 with slightly larger icons and more space in between, but you're also going to be able to see more emails, tweets, Google search results, Engadget posts, calendar appointments and, well More screen space equates to more room for consuming, creating and manipulating content, and since it's still small enough to fit in most jeans pockets provided they're not too tight, it's still more portable than any iPad.
While the megapixel war rages on among manufacturers like Sony, Samsung, LG and Microsoft Devices Nokia, Apple doesn't seem to feel compelled to join the fray.
Instead, it's sticking with a modest 8MP iSight camera similar to the one found n the 5s. Fortunately, Focus Pixels doesn't disappoint; in several side-by-side shots in which my goal was to snap a photo as quickly as possible, the 6 and 6 Plus did considerably better at producing focused images.
This feature is designed to reduce the amount of blur that can come from the natural shaking of your hand, and it produces better low-light performance as a result.
I took several nighttime shots with the 6 and 6 Plus side by side, and although there was no difference in how much light the cameras took in, the images from the Plus consistently came out sharper -- both when viewing at standard size and especially when zoomed in.
I also pitted the Plus head to head against several other flagships. It bested the HTC One M8 in sharpness and white balance, though it didn't get quite as much light; it had more natural colors and less noise than the LG G3; it got more light, better colors and clearer focus than the Galaxy S5; and although the Lumia brought in the most light, it also did so at the expense of unnatural colors and noise.
So the iPhone 6 Plus held its own against nearly every major flagship in terms of low-light images, but how did it and its 4. Shots taken by the Lumia were far more detailed and had a slightly more accurate white balance and color representation outside; but while it did a fantastic job capturing the shadows, the highlights were typically more blown out than they were on the iPhone.
The GS5 is a respectable contender in the daylight as well, offering more detail, but the iPhone generally produced more accurate colors. The G3 appears to be overexposed by default and the dynamic range is not as wide, so shadows are incredibly dark and whites are slightly blown out.
The iPhone camera may not always be the best in every circumstance, but it's consistently near the top in almost every scenario. The autofocus locks quickly; each shot contains all of the detail you'll need unless you have to zoom in incredibly far ; dynamic range is great; and color representation is sound.
And although there weren't a lot of drastic improvements to the new iPhone cameras over the 5s, I know that if I need to snap a quick picture, it's going to turn out well.
Full-res images are now available: I also have uploaded albums with samples from other flagship devices. Last year, Apple rocked the boat by announcing that the iPhone 5s would be the first phone with bit support, thanks to its A7 chip.
This year's bump to an A8 chipset isn't quite as dramatic, but the company is claiming that the chip comes with a 25 percent uptick in CPU performance and 50 percent in GPU output.
It packs 2 billion transistors, which is a number that few other companies boast in product launches; by comparison, Intel's Haswell desktop processor has around 1.
Apple seldom dives into more specifics, but benchmarks reveal that we're looking at a 1. I get why Apple would rather discuss the experience than the actual numbers -- it's because a 1. But I've never had any problems getting iPhones to handle heavy loads, and the 6 and 6 Plus are no different.
Games load and run smoothly and multitasking works great. When it comes to benchmarking, it can be difficult to compare Apples to Androids. There are a few cross-platform tests, however, so I decided to take a look and see how the iPhone 6 holds up to a pair of Snapdragon powered flagships, the Galaxy S5 and the HTC One M8.
As you can see below, the iPhone does better in some areas and worse in others. On SunSpider, it produced the best scores I've seen on any smartphone. It does well on single-threaded activities in Geekbench and keeps up with the Snapdragon in multi-threaded tests.
It does significantly better in Basemark X, but not in 3DMark. The long and short of it is that you shouldn't feel like switching from one flagship phone to another simply because it has more cores; Apple holds its own against the strongest competition, and it still has the advantage of having bit support on both hardware and firmware for at least a short period of time -- at least, until Android L comes out and more chipsets integrate bit support.
The iPhone 6 series also comes with an upgraded motion coprocessor called the M8, which adds barometer support in addition to the accelerometer, gyroscope and compass. Since barometers can sense the variance in air pressure, this means you can now measure changes in elevation.
Those measurements, in turn, will get added to the new iOS Health app. Another interesting side effect of the size difference is how they manage thermal heat dissipation.
Since it's the smaller of the two, the iPhone 6 got noticeably toastier than the Plus when playing games -- in fact, I rarely had any problem with the Plus getting warm.
If you're having trouble choosing between the 6 and its extra-large twin, battery life may be the ultimate deciding factor. It's no secret that the Plus comes with a larger battery and therefore longer runtime than the 6, but how much of a difference will it make?
Turns out, a noticeable one. In our video-playback tests, the 6 lasted 10 hours and 19 minutes; that's actually worse than the 5s results from last year, which managed to go for The iPhone 6 Plus, on the other hand, still had 14 percent battery left when the 6 died.
All told, it lasted almost 12 hours. Both of these results are lower than Apple's claims, but likely are the outcomes of different testing methods. But tests are tests: Real-world performance is where it's at.
And this is where the Plus truly shines. In my usage tests, I do a little bit of everything on the phone: After all that, I got through a full hour workday with just 3 or 4 percent battery life remaining.
On the 6, I managed to squeak out around 13 hours. With moderate to light usage, you should expect to see the Plus get roughly a day and a half, if not more. Both iPhones come in two versions with different sets of wireless frequencies, so you'll want to be aware of the differences.
The first option comes with support for 16 LTE bands, while the second takes the same 16 and adds four more bands for a total of This is the most I've ever seen included in one specific model.
I usually list out which bands are covered on which devices, but let's face it: If the band option doesn't include your specific needs, very few other phones likely will. The latter will ensure the most coverage globally, and will be sold in more places; in the US, however, you'll only find this version on Sprint and US Cellular.
The new iPhones also support WiFi calling with WiFi calling, which offers high-quality phone calls over your wireless router, is a carrier-dependent feature. The rear of the device harbours a conspicuous yet classy OnePlus logo, with the ceramic fingerprint scanner just above it.
The raised dual-camera module carries the same design over from its predecessor, which in turn was borrowed from the iPhone 7 Plus. Overall the phone looks gorgeous with its unibody metal design and gentle curves, although, the fact that you can only buy it in black and the slipperiness of the chassis are disappointing.
The lack of any type of water-proofing is also a huge missed opportunity considering how all flagships these days are expected to be waterproof, with even some mid-range phones sporting the same capability.
The OnePlus is one gorgeous beast with its bezel-less design and 80 percent screen-to-body ratio. Nevertheless, despite its solid build quality, you still have to be mindful of accidental drops considering the slipperiness of the chassis.
On the downside, the quest for minimal bezels has inevitably relegated the fingerprint sensor to the rear of the chassis. Nevertheless, OnePlus deserves credit for getting the fingerprint sensor placement spot on, because the brilliant ceramic sensor is not only lightning quick, it has also been placed so intuitively that your finger just naturally finds its way there.
Not that it matters because pretty much anyone who owns the OnePlus 5T will readily dropkick the fingerprint sensor and instead use the sublime Face Unlock feature as a preferred means of unlocking the phone.
The average smartphone user is more concerned about the ease of use than overall security. I personally tried everything from covering my mouth with my hands and shaving cream to using photos and lookalikes to get past the face recognition system, but Face Unlock proved itself to be secure enough.
The only time I reverted to fingerprint sensor was when I had to unlock the phone in the middle of the night or in the absolute lack of external light. The display looks surprisingly sharp despite its x resolution, thanks to a pixel density of ppi, and the colours look even, well saturated, and quite accurate once you put it in the DCI-P3 mode.
While the display might not be as good as the flagship Samsung and Apple devices, it still is a whole lot better than the LG and Google flagships. The AMOLED panel looks vibrant, offers good sunlight legibility, and sports an auto brightness setting that works well most of the time.
The story is similar with the camera module. It may physically look the same as the telephoto-lens equipped dual-camera setup of the OnePlus 5T, but OnePlus has made some significant revisions.
However, this camera setup is geared more towards improving low-light photography and portrait mode. At megapixels, the secondary sensor has 4 extra megapixels of resolution compared to the megapixel primary sensor.
It is further optimised for low-light photography, with the extra resolution along with some software wizardry allowing it to shoot better in the dark. Compared to its predecessor, low-light images come out sharper and bearing significantly greater amount of detail.
Under good lighting, the photographs carry a surprisingly good amount of detail and fairly accurate colour reproduction as well. Initially, I had put this down to the brilliant AMOLED display, but when I viewed the photographs on my colour calibrated monitor, I was pleasantly surprised by the overall camera quality.
The EIS works similarly well with videos, although I noticed some video compression related artefacting on p60 videos shot with complicated subject matter such as dense foliage. Everything else is a piece of cake, with the videos exhibiting a decent amount of detail.
The portrait mode works great thanks to a new algorithm and a dual-camera setup optimised for this very purpose. The slow motion and time lapse modes work just as advertised, with the panorama mode proving itself to be quite adept at stitching and equalising gamma and white balance despite shooting under complicated lighting conditions.
The camera UI is fast and intuitive, with the Pro Mode actually allowing you to fine-tune advanced parameters that lead to significantly better shots, especially when the auto-mode fails to get it right.
Having used both versions for quite some time, I can safely say that at no point of time did the 6GB version leave me wanting for memory, no matter how many apps I had running. The only reason to go for the top end version, then, would be for the generous internal storage and not because it comes with extra 2GB of RAM.
The octa-core Snapdragon chip is paired with the powerful Adreno GPU, which can run pretty much any app or game you throw at it with consummate ease. And the proof is in the pudding, or the synthetic benchmarks in this case.
The synthetic benchmarks, along with the AnTuTu score of 1,80, pegs it around the same performance ballpark of the erstwhile OnePlus 5 and its other flagship competition for that matter.
However, what sets the OnePlus 5T apart is the painstaking optimisation that makes it feel like the fastest phone there is this side of the Google Pixel 2. The story repeats itself in the real-world tests, with everything from resource heavy apps such as Prisma to demanding games such as Modern Combat 5 and Asphalt 8: The custom skin appears near stock and has zero bloat, while retaining some of the more useful features associated with custom Android skins.
This is akin to having your cake and eating it too, because you are essentially blessed with the performance and refinement of stock Android, while being pampered with all the features that make your phone productive right out of the box.
However, even the Android 7. Apart from the handy screenshot tool and other useful utilities baked into the Oxygen OS, the UI itself is light with snappy animations and carries a long list of customisation options that allow you to assign gestures to the fingerprint sensor, add and remove items from the notification shade, customise onscreen navigation buttons and assign shortcuts to the same, and more.
Apart from the split-screen mode that makes great use of the ultra-wide aspect ratio, OnePlus has added a nifty new feature dubbed Parallel Apps. This lets you clone apps such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, Twitter, LinkedIn, and more — basically apps where some people can benefit from having access to multiple accounts spanning work and personal, to even enabling easy access to sockpuppets for perennial trolls.
My only gripe with Oxygen OS is the piss poor management of photographs in the gallery app. I make it a point to recreate several months of usage on all my review units, and for that purpose I tend to dump a couple thousand photos onto the phone.
The OnePlus 5T makes this process excruciatingly painful with its pitiful photo segregation. That means I have no choice but to visually sift between a sea of memes saved from Facebook in order to find the photos that were snapped through the camera.
We already know that the OnePlus 5T has top-of-the-line hardware and the software too has been optimised to perfection. Combine the miniaturised 10nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon SoC with the cleverly optimised Oxygen OS, and you get a phone that delivers notably better battery life than its other Snapdragon equipped competitors.
Mind you, all of my OnePlus 5T usage has been with all the radios switched on all the time, moderate gaming, heavy media consumption, virtually constant usage of messaging apps, and quite a bit of the power-hungry Facebook and Instagram as well.
It works by offloading all battery management circuitry to the power brick, which does result in a rather gigantic wall adapter, but the dividends for this inconvenience are pretty magnificent.
The Dash Charge mode can juice up the near-flat battery to 30 percent in fifteen minutes, with nearly 60 percent of charge being restored in 30 minutes. Thereafter, the charging is slow, with the battery requiring around 90 minutes to reach percent.
The OnePlus 5T is beyond doubt, the fastest charging phone in the market right now, and the Dash Charge feature makes emergency top-ups so convenient that it will be hard to run your phone flat even if you have the leave the house in a hurry.
The latter has some interesting AI integration that could potentially turn out to have significant impact, or not, but only time will tell. In other words, buy the OnePlus 5T unless you want a better camera.
The discontinued phone has the exact same hardware specifications as the OnePlus 5T, with the OnePlus 5 lacking the new bezel-less design and the However, what makes a major difference is the camera.
The OnePlus 5T has a significantly better snapper that shoots sharper and detailed images and performs much better in low light conditions compared to its discontinued sibling.
But, for all intents and purposes, nothing truly comes close to the OnePlus 5T at its price range. We already know that the Snapdragon SoC poised to be included in the upcoming phone is slated to be a game-changer due to the hardware-based support for AI and machine learning.
OnePlus 5T GB. The device runs Android 7. Fuelled by a Li-Po 3,mAh battery coupled with the proprietary Dash Charging technology, the smartphone offers an overwhelming charging solution.
The next variant of this smartphone is Oneplus 6. OnePlus 5T Price in India. An exercise in staying relevant by Nachiket Mhatre.
Coments:
No sir...